Just received my first ever Publishers Weekly review! It’s on my historical With Violets. They consider it a debut novel since it’s my first book published as Elizabeth Robards. Here’s what they have to say:
With Violets
Elizabeth Robards. Avon, $13.95 paper (320p)
ISBN 978-0-06-157912-7
In her debut novel, Robards takes up
the story of impressionist painter Berthe
Morisot, who was a friend and lover of fellow
artist Edouard Manet, and imagines a
love affair between them against the backdrop
of a disapproving time. After they
first meet in the Louvre, Manet invites
Morisot to his studio, where he paints the
first of what would be countless portraits.
Morisot basks in the great man’s attention,
but she must learn to tread carefully
around Manet’s wife. Together, the painters
test the limits of propriety, engaging in a
risky affair that is compromised bit by bit
over time, leading to unexpected ends. Robards
constructs a convincing plot for these
real-life characters, her sense of emotion is
keen and the setting serviceably rendered,
but readers looking for insight into the art
should look elsewhere. (Nov.)
Hmm... Sort of conjures the feeling, "Thanks, I think..." But since my editor was pleased, and I wasn't aiming to "teach" art history, I suppose it's a good review. Although, if the reviewer would've paid attention, he/she might have learned something … such as how the Salon de Paris operated... how the Impressionists formed... how they got their name... there was even an actual review of the first exhibit... I wasn't trying to hit people over the head with a history lesson, but subtle details were definitely there.
What do you think? Where’s the fine line between teaching and entertaining? Or are writers of fiction obligated to teach?
What a gorgeous cover!! I look forward to reading your book and wish you success with it. I love reading about the artists, their muses, etc. Linda/CT
Posted by: Linda Sheehan | October 29, 2008 at 01:33 PM
I loved your book!
Posted by: D. Armstrong | January 13, 2009 at 02:45 PM